aneuploidies (SCAs) high risk results and 58 (0.23%, 58/25 334) rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) high risk cases. 132 SCAs high risk cases received prenatal diagnosis, among which 44 cases had consistent
results with NIPT, with a overall positive predict value (PPV) of 33.3%. The PPV for chrX-, chrX+,
chrX+(Y), chrX-(Y) and chrY+ were 14.29%, 36.36%, 58.62%, 0.00% and 100.00%, respectively. 49
RATs high risk cases received prenatal diagnosis, and the most common RATs high risk happened with
chromosome 7 (seven cases). When the prenatal diagnostic results were discordant with NIPT fifindings,
25.0% (22/88) of the SCAs were due to maternal reasons, and 8.6% (3/35) of the RATs were due to
maternal reasons. Conclusions The unexpected fifindings after NIPT wwre not rare, with different PPV
for different chromosomes. Fetus-placenta chromosomal discordance and maternal reasons might be the
main reasons of discordant results of NIPT and prenatal diagnosis. Invasive prenatal diagnosis should be recommended for the unexpected fifindings, and more attention should be paid for mosaic trisomies and pregnancy outcomes.