Journal of Developmental Medicine(Electronic Version)  2022, Vol. 10 Issue (2): 107-113 DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2022.02.005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Study on the efficacy of utilizing conductive education combine with kinesiotherapy in children with cerebral palsy |
| Li Lihong,Yang Liya, Han Feng, et al
|
(1. Department of Pediatricsand Rehabilitation, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Hebei, Shijiazhuang 050000, China; 2. Department ofChildren's Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Hebei, Shijiazhuang 050000, China)
|
|
|
|
Abstract 【Abstract】 Objective To observe the efficacy of conductive education combined with kinesiotherapy
on motor function and daily living ability of children with cerebral palsy. Method From January 2018
to January 2019, 80 children aged 1-8 years who were diagnosed cerebral palsy in Shijiazhuang People's
Hospital for the first time were divided into two groups: children younger than 3 years were infants group
(n=20), children older than 3 years or equal were children's group (n=60). Two groups were further divided into study group and control group according to the randomized digital table method. The study group appliedconductive education and kinesiotherapy, and the control group were treated with kinesiotherapy alone.The gross motor function measure-88 (GMFM-88) and the part of self-care ability of pediatric evaluationof disability inventory (PEDI) before and after treatment in two groups were compared respectively. t-test,χ2 test and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis. Result In infants, there were no differencebefore treatment in the scores of GMFM-88 between the two groups (P>0.05). The GMFM-88 score wassignificantly higher after 3 months of treatment than before treatment, the study group was (142±16) points,the control group was (138±14) points, and the score of study group was better than that of control group.The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no difference before treatment in the scoresof PEDI (self-care ability part) between the study group and control group (P>0.05). The PEDI (self-careability section) score was significantly higher after 3 months of treatment than before treatment, the studygroup was (31±8) points, the control group was (27±7) points, and the score of study group was better thanthat of control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In children, there were no differencebefore treatment in the score of GMFM-88 between the two groups (P>0.05). The GMFM-88 scores weresignificantly higher after 3 months of treatment than before treatment, the study group was (178±21) points,the control group was (169±17) points, and the score of study group was better than that of control group.The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no difference before treatment in the scores ofPEDI (self-care ability part) between the two groups (P>0.05). The PEDI (self-care ability section) score wassignificantly higher after 3 months of treatment than before treatment, the study group was (41±8) points, thecontrol group was (35±6) points, and the score of study group was better than that of control group, thedifference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of conductive education combinewith kinesiotherapy is better than that of kinesiotherapy alone, so it is worth of popularizing and applying
further in clinic.
|
|
Received: 24 February 2021
Published: 31 March 2022
|
|
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|
