Please wait a minute...
欢迎访问发育医学电子杂志,今天是
发育医学电子杂志  2025, Vol. 13 Issue (2): 103-108    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2025.02.004
  结构畸形   论著 |
两种方法治疗婴儿姿势性斜头畸形的临床效果比较
吴晓燕 尚美辰 刘华 戴娜 朱红静 杨明
(北京和睦家医院 儿科,北京100015)
Comparison of clinical effects between two methods for treating positional plagiocephaly in infants
Wu Xiaoyan, Shang Meichen, Liu Hua, et al
(Department of Pediatric, BeijingUnited Family Hospital, Beijing 100015, China)
下载:  PDF (1001KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【摘要】 目的  探讨体位调整效果欠佳者序贯头型矫正器(cranial remolding orthoses,CRO)治疗及单
纯CRO 治疗在婴儿姿势性斜头畸形(positional plagiocephaly,PP)治疗中的临床效果,以优化治疗策
略。 方法 采用回顾性研究纳入2019 年2 月至2024 年2 月北京和睦家医院儿科头型矫正门诊治疗
的85 例3~7 月龄PP 婴儿。按照自愿原则选择治疗方法,56 例为体位调整组,其中24 例体位调整无效的婴儿中18 例体位调整效果欠佳接受CRO 治疗;29 例首选CRO 治疗。通过三维激光获取技术测量头颅不对称度(cranial vault asymmetry,CVA)、头颅不对称指数(cranial vault asymmetry index,CVAI)、
前部对称比(anterior symmetry ratio,ASR)及后部对称比(posterior symmetry ratio,PSR)。以CVAI 改善率作为评估斜头畸形治疗效果的参考数据。CVAI 改善率≥ 10% 定义为治疗干预有效。比较两种治疗
方案的临床效果。统计学方法采用t 检验和Mann-Whitney U 检验。 结果  体位调整治疗组有效率为
57.1%(32/56),CVAI 改善率为[19.0(1.6,37.9)]%。18 例接受了序贯CRO 治疗,有效率为100% (18/18),CVAI 改善率为[51.5(38.0,68.4)]%,序贯CRO 治疗后CVAI 低于治疗前[(3.0±1.3)% 与(7.0±2.3)%,t=6.248,P<0.001] ;单纯CRO 治疗组有效率为100%(29/29),CVAI 改善率为[53.7(33.4,67.3)]%,与序贯CRO 治疗差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.120,P>0.05),单纯CRO 治疗后CVAI 低于治疗前[((7.5±2.3)% 与(3.5±1.7)%,t=7.191,P<0.001)]。序贯治疗时间长于单纯CRO 治疗[(5.7±2.2)个月与(3.4±1.5)个月,t=4.288,P<0.001)]。序贯治疗佩戴CRO 的时间长于单纯CRO 治疗[(4.4±1.8)个月与(3.4±1.5)个月,t=2.129,P<0.05)]。两组间治疗前后斜头畸形的严重程度及治疗效果差异均无统计学意义(P 值均>0.05)。 结论 对于3~7 月龄PP 婴儿,体位调整可以让50% 以上婴儿头型得到有效的改善,但其治疗效果不及CRO 治疗。如果体位调整效果欠佳采用序贯CRO 治疗,与单纯CRO 治疗效果相似,但是单纯CRO 治疗时间短于序贯治疗。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词:  姿势性斜头畸形  体位调整  头型矫正器  头颅不对称指数  前部对称比  后部对称比    
Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To explore the clinical effects of positional adjustment unsatisfied sequential
cranial remolding orthoses (CRO) and CRO alone treatment in the treatment of infant positional
plagiocephaly (PP), in order to optimize treatment strategies. Method A total of 85 infants with PP aged 3 to 7 months treated at the Pediatric Head Correction Clinic of Beijing United Family Hospital from February 2019 to February 2024 were included in the retrospective study. According to the principle of voluntary selection of treatment methods, 56 cases were in the postural adjustment group, of which 18 out of 24 infants with ineffective postural adjustment received CRO treatment; CRO treatment was preferred in 29 cases Measurement of cranial vault asymmetry (CVA), cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), anterior symmetry ratio (ASR), and posterior symmetry ratio (PSR) using three-dimensional laser acquisition technology. The improvement rate of CVAI was used as reference data to evaluate the treatment effect of PP. CVAI improvement rate ≥ 10% was defined as effective treatment intervention. Compare the clinical outcomes of two treatment options. Statistical methods performed by t-test, Mann-Whitney U test.  Result The effectiveness rate of the positional adjustment treatment group was 57.1% (32/56), with a CVAI improvement rate of [19.0(1.6, 37.9)]%. Among them, 18 patients received sequential CRO treatment, achieving an effectiveness rate of 100% (18/18) and a CVAI improvement rate of [51.5 (38.0, 68.4)]%. The CVAI after sequential CRO treatment was significantly lower than before treatment [(3.0±1.3)% vs (7.0±2.3)%, t=6.248, P<0.001]. The effectiveness rate of the pure CRO treatment group was 100% (29/29), with a CVAI improvement rate of [53.7 (33.4, 67.3)]%, showing no statistically significant difference compared to the sequential CRO treatment group (Z=-0.120, P>0.05). The CVAI after pure CRO treatment was significantly lower than before treatment[(7.5±2.3)% vs (3.5±1.7)%, t=7.191, P<0.001]. The duration of sequential treatment was longer than that ofpure CRO treatment [(5.7±2.2) months vs (3.4±1.5) months, t=4.288, P<0.001]. The duration of CRO use
in the sequential treatment group was also longer than in the pure CRO group [(4.4±1.8) months vs (3.4±1.5)months, t= 2.129, P < 0.05]. There were no statistically significant differences in the severity of plagiocephalyor treatment outcomes between the two groups before and after treatment (all P>0.05). Conclusion For infants aged 3 to 7 months with PP, positional adjustment can effectively improve head shape in more than 50% of cases, but its therapeutic effect is not as significant as that of CRO therapy. If positional adjustment yields suboptimal results, sequential CRO therapy achieves similar outcomes to pure CRO therapy. However the duration of pure CRO therapy is shorter than that of sequential therapy.
Key words:  Positional plagiocephaly    Positional adjustment    Cranial remolding orthoses    Cranial vault asymmetry index    Anterior symmetry ratio    Posterior symmetry ratio
收稿日期:  2024-12-06                     发布日期:  2025-04-02     
通讯作者:  杨明    E-mail:  yang.ming@ufh.com.cn
引用本文:    
吴晓燕 尚美辰 刘华 戴娜 朱红静 杨明. 两种方法治疗婴儿姿势性斜头畸形的临床效果比较[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2025, 13(2): 103-108.
Wu Xiaoyan, Shang Meichen, Liu Hua, et al. Comparison of clinical effects between two methods for treating positional plagiocephaly in infants. Journal of Developmental Medicine(Electronic Version), 2025, 13(2): 103-108.
链接本文:  
http://www.fyyxzz.com/CN/10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2025.02.004  或          http://www.fyyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V13/I2/103
No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed