Please wait a minute...
欢迎访问发育医学电子杂志,今天是
发育医学电子杂志  2025, Vol. 13 Issue (2): 120-127    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2025.02.007
  围产医学   论著 |产科 |
基于血清sTNFR- Ⅱ与血栓弹力图评价子痫前期病情及母儿并发症发生风险
娄娟 顾成敏 李洋 鲁会红 冯敏
秦皇岛市妇幼保健院 产科,河北 秦皇岛066000
Evaluation of preeclampsia severity and the risk of maternal and fetal complications based on serum sTNFR-Ⅱ and thromboelastography
Lou Juan, Gu Chengmin, Li Yang,et al
Department of Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao, Hebei, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
下载:  PDF (993KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【摘要】 目的  基于血清可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体(soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor,sTNFR) - Ⅱ
与血栓弹力图(thrombelastography,TEG)评价子痫前期病情及母儿并发症发生风险,为改善子痫前期
患者预后提供有利参考。 方法 采用回顾性研究方法,选取2020 年3 月至2023 年1 月秦皇岛市妇幼保健院收治的70 例子痫前期孕妇,根据病情程度不同分为非重度子痫前期组(n=38)、重度子痫前期组(n=32),另选取同期70 例妊娠晚期妊娠期高血压孕妇为妊娠期高血压组、70 例正常妊娠晚期孕妇
为正常妊娠组,入组后检测血清sTNFR- Ⅱ水平、TEG 参数[血凝块形成速率(rate of hemagglutination
formationα,α 角)、凝血反应时间(coagulation reaction time,R)、凝血综合指数(coagulation index,CI)、血细胞凝集块形成时间(blood clot formation time,K)、血细胞凝集块、最大振幅(blood clot maximumintensity,MA)],并随访至妊娠终止,监测孕妇病情及围产儿并发症情况。比较4 组血清sTNFR- Ⅱ水平及TEG 参数,分析其与子痫前期凝血指标的关系,比较不同预后患者血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、TEG 参数,分析血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、TEG 参数对母儿并发症诊断的影响及其与母儿并发症的关系。统计学方法采用 单
因素方差分析、t 检验、χ2 检验,采用Spearman 法描述各变量之间的相关性,受试者操作特征(receiver
operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析TEG 参数对母儿并发症的诊断价值,采用危险度分析TEG 参
数与母儿并发症的关系。 结果  重度子痫前期组的血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、α 角、CI、MA 均高于非重度
子痫前期组、妊娠期高血压组、正常妊娠组,差异有统计学意义(P 值均<0.05);重度子痫前期组的R、
K 均低于非重度子痫前期组、妊娠期高血压组、正常妊娠组,差异有统计学意义(P 值均<0.05);血清
sTNFR- Ⅱ、TEG 参数中α 角、CI、MA 与子痫前期病情程度呈正相关(r 值分别为0.681、0.584、0.734、
0.610,P 值均<0.05),R、K 与子痫前期病情程度呈负相关(r 值分别为-0.602、-0.557,P 值均<0.05);重度子痫前期组母儿并发症发生率高于非重度子痫前期组[56.25%(18/32)与26.32%(10/38),χ2=6.486,P<0.05] ;发生母儿并发症的子痫前期患者血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、α 角、CI、MA 均高于未发生母儿并发症患者(P 值均<0.05);发生母儿并发症的子痫前期患者R、K 均低于未发生母儿并发症患者(P 值均<0.05);血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、α 角、R、CI、K、MA 联合预测子痫前期母儿并发症的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)值最大,为0.950(95% CI:0.870~0.988)(P<0.05);血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、α 角、R、CI、K、MA 所致母儿并发症的相对危险度分别为3.240(95% CI :1.780~5.897)、2.632(95% CI :1.384~5.003)、2.356(95% CI :1.381~4.023)、0.326(95% CI :0.184~0.578)、4.933(95% CI :2.108~11.543)、0.338(95% CI :0.175~0.653)(P 值均<0.001)。 结论 子痫前期不同病情程度患者血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、TEG参数存在明显差异,血清sTNFR- Ⅱ、α 角、R、CI、K、MA 与子痫前期病情联系密切,联合检测对子痫前期母儿并发症有较高的预测价值,对临床评估子痫前期病情、减少母儿并发症具有现实指导作用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词:  子痫前期  血清可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体- Ⅱ  血栓弹力图  并发症  危险度  相关性  预测价值    
Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the severity of preeclampsia and the risk of maternal and fetal
complications based on serum soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (sTNFR)-Ⅱ and thrombelastography
(TEG), and provide a favorable reference for improving the prognosis of preeclampsia patients. 
Method Seventy pregnant women with preeclampsia who were admitted to the Maternal and Child Care
Center of Qinhuangdao from March 2020 to January 2023 by retrospective study, which were selected
and divided into non-severe preeclampsia group (n=38) and severe preeclampsia group (n=32) based
on the severity of their condition. Additionally, 70 pregnant women with gestational hypertension in the
third trimester (gestational hypertension group) and 70 normal pregnant women in the third trimester
(normal pregnancy group) were also selected as controls. After enrollment, serum levels of sTNFR-II were
measured, and TEG parameters [rate of hemagglutination formation (α angle), coagulation reaction time
(R), coagulation index (CI), blood clot formation time (K), and blood clots maximum amplitude (MA)] were
assessed. Follow-up visits were conducted until the end of pregnancy to monitor the condition of the pregnant women and perinatal complications. The serum sTNFR-Ⅱ levels and TEG parameters were compared among the four groups, and the relationship between serum sTNFR-Ⅱ, TEG parameters, and coagulation indicators of preeclampsia was analyzed. The serum sTNFR-Ⅱand TEG parameters were compared among patients with different prognoses, and the impact of serum sTNFR-Ⅱ and TEG parameters on the diagnosis of maternal and fetal complications and their relationship with maternal and fetal complications were analyzed. Statistical methods included one-way analysis of variance, t-test, χ2 test, and Spearman correlation analysis to describe the correlation between variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of TEG parameters for maternal and fetal complications, and risk degree analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between TEG parameters and maternal and fetal complications.  Result Serum sTNFR-Ⅱ, α angle, CI and MA in severe preeclampsia group were higher than those in non-severe preeclampsia group, gestational hypertension group and normal pregnancy group, with statistical significance (all P<0.05); The R and K of severe preeclampsia group were lower than those of non-severe preeclampsia group, gestational hypertension group and normal pregnancy group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Serum sTNFR-Ⅱ, TEG parameters α angle, CI, and MA showed a positive correlation with the severity of preeclampsia (r=0.681, 0.584, 0.734, 0.610, respectively; all
P<0.05). R and K values showed a negative correlation with the severity of preeclampsia (r=-0.602, -0.557,respectively; all P<0.05). The incidence of maternal and fetal complications in severe preeclampsia group was higher than that in non-severe preeclampsia group [56.25% (18/32) vs 26.32% (10/38), χ2=6.486, P<0.05]; the serum sTNFR-Ⅱ, α angle, CI and MA in preeclampsia patients with maternal and fetal complications were higher than in those without maternal and fetal complications (all P<0.05). The R and K of preeclampsia patients with maternal and fetal complications were lower than those of patients without maternal and fetal complications (P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values of serum sTNFR-II, α angle, R, CI, K, and MA combined detection for predicting maternal and fetal complications in preeclampsia were the highest, at 0.950 (95% CI: 0.870-0.988) (P<0.05). The relative risk ratio of maternal and fetal complications caused by serum sTNFR-II, α angle, R, CI, K, and MA were 3.240 (95% CI: 1.780-5.897), 2.632 (95% CI: 1.384-5.003), 2.356 (95% CI: 1.381-4.023), 0.326 (95% CI: 0.184-0.578), 4.933 (95% CI: 2.108-11.543), and 0.338(95% CI: 0.175-0.653), respectively (all P<0.001). Conclusion There are significant differences in serum sTNFR-II and TEG parameters in different degrees of preeclampsia, and serum sTNFR-II, α angle, R, CI,K, and MA are closely associated with the severity of preeclampsia. Combined detection has high predictive value for maternal and fetal complications in preeclampsia, and has practical guidance for clinical evaluation of preeclampsia severity and reduction of maternal and fetal complications.
Key words:  Preeclampsia    Serum soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-Ⅱ    Thromboelastogram    Complication    Risk degree    Relevance    Predictive value
收稿日期:  2023-11-08                     发布日期:  2025-04-02     
基金资助: 科学技术研究与发展计划项目(202301A161)
通讯作者:  顾成敏    E-mail:  77361805@qq.com
引用本文:    
娄娟 顾成敏 李洋 鲁会红 冯敏. 基于血清sTNFR- Ⅱ与血栓弹力图评价子痫前期病情及母儿并发症发生风险[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2025, 13(2): 120-127.
Lou Juan, Gu Chengmin, Li Yang, et al. Evaluation of preeclampsia severity and the risk of maternal and fetal complications based on serum sTNFR-Ⅱ and thromboelastography. Journal of Developmental Medicine(Electronic Version), 2025, 13(2): 120-127.
链接本文:  
http://www.fyyxzz.com/CN/10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2025.02.007  或          http://www.fyyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V13/I2/120
[1] 朱文丽 娄艳慧 赵玉玲. 血清NLR、PLR 在子痫前期孕妇中的表达及其与血压、24 h 尿蛋白、围产结局的关系[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2025, 13(2): 128-132.
[2] 山蕾 周涛 邱娟娟 倪晴 柏婷 彭兰. sFlt-1/PLGF 比值在子痫前期中的应用进展[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2025, 13(2): 154-160.
[3] 魏贤 杨树杰 甘斌 蔡大芬. 不同胎龄双胎出生体质量不一致早产儿的围产因素及并发症分析[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2025, 13(1): 11-18.
[4] 桂琦 侯伟 胡甲琳 姜淑芳 游艳琴 卢彦平. 系统性红斑狼疮与子痫前期因果关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2024, 12(6): 415-421.
[5] 陈海琛 王寿福 吴永隆 胡杨 徐波. 改良阴茎头段Inlay 术治疗尿道下裂患儿的短期疗效[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2024, 12(6): 457-461.
[6] 黄雪美 陈亿仙 陈健平 韦拔 韦舒旻 潘双静 蒋永江. 新生儿重症监护病房中心导管相关性血栓的研究进展[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2024, 12(5): 385-390,395.
[7] 孙超颖 马丹丹 赵娥 侯海燕. 微小RNA 在妊娠期糖尿病发病机制及并发症中的作用[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2024, 12(3): 229-234.
[8] 李磊  程莉萍 雷娜  李婷  吴鸿雁  张艳平. 宫内转运在救治高危早产儿中的应用[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2023, 11(4): 316-320.
[9] 曾贵红 邹伟洋 刘长娣 陈玉兰 温婷媚. 妊娠期特有并发症患者不同孕期脂代谢异质性及临床监测意义[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2023, 11(3): 174-180.
[10] 魏红娟. 足月臀位产妇的孕前体质量指数与新生儿入院风险的相关性分析[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2023, 11(1): 44-49.
[11] 高洋  赵宝红 任红霞. 新生儿肠造瘘术后并发症及危险因素分析[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2022, 10(6): 434-439.
[12] 李育霖 孙萌 李盼盼 邹卉. 甲基丙二酸血症合并眼部并发症文献复习和总结[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2022, 10(5): 386-391.
[13] 郭明 焦明月 尚志忠 姜彦彪 马彬 张雪峰. 脐静脉置管时长对危重症新生儿并发症的影响[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2022, 10(3): 168-173.
[14] 朱大华 陈家莲 胡洋 夏雪 赵雪 郭贝西 牟华平. HPV DNA 检测、HPV E6/E7 mRNA 检测和液基薄层细胞学检查对宫颈切除术后病灶残留或复发的预测价值[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2022, 10(3): 203-208.
[15] 郭玲玲 杨志清 王海星 张靓 郭燕青 郝崇奇 齐昊. 子痫前期对早产的影响及潜在交互作用[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2021, 9(6): 437-442.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed